Literature Review #5

Here is a picture of what is marketed as a “Premium Ghost Hunting Digital EVP Recorder” on Amazon. Upon closer inspection, this product is just an ordinary digital voice recorder.

https://www.amazon.com/Premium-Ghost-Hunting-Digital-Recorder/dp/B0888V7B9H


Axtell, Cassie C., "Assessing Electronic Voice Phenomena through Speech Science." 

    Honors Theses, Encompass, 2017, https://encompass.eku.edu/honors_theses/415


Axtell explores some of the history behind EVPs and analyzes the reliability of using EVPs as a method for ghosts to communicate with humans. She mentions examples of different experiments that show how interpretations of EVPs vary significantly between people, which indicates that EVP interpretations may not be accurate at all. She also applies the possibilities of apophenia and priming to ghost hunting and EVPs. Axtell further laments the lack of speech scientists and speech analysis during EVP interpretations; thus, all that ghost hunters have are listeners’ unreliable perceptions of EVPs. 


I was unable to find much information about Cassie C. Axtell online. However, the source should still be considered scholarly, as it is her honors thesis for her Bachelor’s degree from Eastern Kentucky University. Thus, it was likely reviewed by a number of professors from this university.


Two key terms used in this source are “apophenia” and “priming.” “Apophenia” refers to how people tend to make patterns or sense out of nothing. In the context of EVPs and ghost hunting, “priming” refers to how prior knowledge of a so-called apparition can affect what paranormal investigators perceive, thus allowing the investigators to hear what they want to hear from recordings. 


Quotes

1. “It has been proposed countless times that the paranormal entities heard on EVP recordings do so by manipulating the sound energy into a rough imitation of human speech as a form of communication” (Axtell 3).

2. Dr. Mark Leary of Duke University “concluded that investigators should hold some degree of disbelief in their interpretations in EVPs seeing as an average of only 22% of interpretations were shared across listeners” (Axtell 11).

3. “No societies reported any additional alteration or editing techniques outside of basic amplification and slowing of speed to enhance the intelligibility of the recording. Many report that additional edits lead to a distortion of sound, and ultimately less reliable interpretations” (Axtell 24).


This source is helpful because it explores the background of EVP as well as EVP practices today very thoroughly. Axtell provides a lot of statistical information about the accuracy and reliability of EVPs, which I was able to use in my paper. In addition, after revisiting this paper after my oral presentation, I was able to find that, according to paranormal investigation societies, paranormal investigators do not edit their EVPs beyond playback speed or basic amplification. I do not know how reliable this is, as this is coming from investigators themselves who may not be perfectly objective or honest, but I remember being asked about editing EVPs during my presentation. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Scouting the Territory

    I'd like to mostly keep my original topic but focus more on the history of séances and the occult (possibly just in America, but I'm not entirely certain for now). I'd also like to talk about why people seem to be so fascinated with the idea of ghosts and contacting the dead. I still think it would be interesting to further explore more "modern" and "scientific" ways of contacting spirits today as well; however, after looking into the topic some more, I think I will end up discussing actual scientific explanations for why people think they see ghosts as well as the reasons for why different technologies used to detect or contact ghosts actually prove nothing. Originally, I wanted to touch on both sides of the "Are ghosts real?" argument, but after doing some further research, it would be far easier for me to explain why ghosts do not exist, as I am now thoroughly a skeptic. Thinking ahead, I think I'd like to open my paper with the hist
Read more

Research Blog #9: Argument and Counterargument

This is my argument: The use of gadgets like EMF (electromagnetic frequency) readers and audio recorders to capture EVPs (electronic voice phenomenon) allows ghost hunters to falsely present their findings as scientific, and the prominence of paranormal media reinforces this misunderstanding. This representation of ghost-hunting technologies, as a result of the “naturalizing” effect, incorrectly legitimizes paranormal investigations and tricks people into trusting the flimsy evidence that such technologies provide. The general public’s lack of scientific understanding makes them susceptible to this misconception, thus perpetuating a belief in paranormal existence.  These are my research questions: In what ways do ghost hunting technologies falsely legitimize the scientific aspect of the paranormal? How does the media (i.e., paranormal programming) perpetuate these misunderstandings? Ghost hunting technologies make the paranormal seem scientific as a result of the “naturalizing” effect;
Read more

Research Blog #10: Abstract and Works Cited

 Abstract The rise in popularity of paranormal media has been followed by a growth of paranormal belief throughout the twenty-first century. The gadgets used in paranormal media results in a scientific presentation of ghosts and paranormal existence. This paper explores how the technology-heavy representation of ghost-hunting tools in paranormal media misleads viewers into believing that ghosts can currently be scientifically proven with evidence like EMF and EVP. This paper also examines the factors behind viewers’ tendency to paranormal belief, such as the naturalizing effect, the public’s lack of scientific understanding, and social influence.  Works Cited (Note: Formatting may be odd on Blogger despite my attempts at reformatting) Axtell, Cassie C., "Assessing Electronic Voice Phenomena through Speech Science"  (2017).   Honors Theses . 415. https://encompass.eku.edu/honors_theses/415 Buckner V, John E., and Rebecca Anders Buckner. “Talking to the Dead, Listening  to  You
Read more